Apple iPhone 14 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Tecno Spark 30C alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Apple iPhone 14

Apple iPhone 14
-
A15 Bionic
5 nm
-
3279 mAh
20W
-
6.1"
1170 x 2532 pixels
-
12 MP
4K@24/25/30/60fps
-
Specs
Tecno Spark 30C

Tecno Spark 30C
-
Dimensity 6300
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
48 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 256GB (NVMe)
6GB 512GB (NVMe)
4GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 1.9µm, dual pixel PDAF, sensor-shift OIS
12 MP
f/2.4, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide)
(wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF
1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps, HDR
f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/3.6", PDAF
SL 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor)
1080p@25/30/60/120fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: eSIM
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N25, N26, N28, N30
TDD: N38, N40, N77, N78, N79
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N12, N20, N25
TDD: N38, N40, N77, N78, N79
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
In this performance comparison, the Apple iPhone 14 with its Apple A15 Bionic (5nm) performs better than the Tecno Spark 30C with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Apple iPhone 14 features a superior AMOLED display, while Tecno Spark 30C comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Tecno Spark 30C offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Apple iPhone 14 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Tecno Spark 30C features a larger 5000 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Apple iPhone 14 also supports faster wired charging at 20W, compared to 18W on Tecno Spark 30C. Apple iPhone 14 supports wireless charging at 15W, while Tecno Spark 30C does not support wireless charging.
Apple iPhone 14 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP68 rating.
- Apple iPhone 14 – Check price here
- Tecno Spark 30C – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.