Google Pixel 7a alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Bold N1 Pro alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Google Pixel 7a

Google Pixel 7a
-
Tensor G2
5 nm
-
4385 mAh
18W
-
6.1"
1080 x 2400 pixels
-
64 MP
4K@30/60fps
-
Specs
Lava Bold N1 Pro

Lava Bold N1 Pro
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
13 MP
f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
(wide), PDAF
1080p@30/60/120/240fps
f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: eSIM
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N12, N20, N25
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N75, N76, N77, N78, N79
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N12, N20, N25, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N75, N76, N77, N78, N79
In this comparison, the Google Pixel 7a with the Google Tensor G2 (5nm) performs better than the Lava Bold N1 Pro with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Google Pixel 7a has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Bold N1 Pro uses an LCD panel. Moreover, Lava Bold N1 Pro offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Google Pixel 7a has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Lava Bold N1 Pro has a larger 5000 mAh battery for longer usage. They support 18W wired charging. Google Pixel 7a supports wireless charging at 5W, while Lava Bold N1 Pro lacks this feature.
Google Pixel 7a offers better water and dust resistance with an IP67 rating.