Google Pixel 7a alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Google Pixel 7a

Google Pixel 7a
-
Tensor G2
5 nm
-
4385 mAh
18W
-
6.1"
1080 x 2400 pixels
-
64 MP
4K@30/60fps
-
Specs
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
13 MP
f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
(wide), AF
1080p@30/60/120/240fps
f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: eSIM
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N12, N20, N25
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N75, N76, N77, N78, N79
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N12, N20, N25, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N75, N76, N77, N78, N79
In this performance comparison, the Google Pixel 7a with its Google Tensor G2 (5nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Google Pixel 7a features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Lava Shark 4G offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Google Pixel 7a offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Lava Shark 4G features a larger 5000 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Both devices support the same wired charging speed of 18W. Google Pixel 7a supports wireless charging at 5W, while Lava Shark 4G does not support wireless charging.
Google Pixel 7a offers better protection against water and dust with an IP67 rating.
- Google Pixel 7a – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.