Google Pixel 7a alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y39 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Google Pixel 7a

Google Pixel 7a
-
Tensor G2
5 nm
-
4385 mAh
18W
-
6.1"
1080 x 2400 pixels
-
64 MP
4K@30/60fps
-
Specs
2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
13 MP
f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30/60/120/240fps
f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm
f/2.0, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: eSIM
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
18 5G bands
n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n12, n20, n25, n38, n40, n41, n66, n75, n76, n77, n78, n79
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Google Pixel 7a with its Google Tensor G2 (5nm) performs better than the Vivo Y39 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Google Pixel 7a offers 3 years of OS updates, whereas Vivo Y39 provides 2 years. For security updates, Google Pixel 7a offers 5 years of support compared to Vivo Y39's 3 years.
Google Pixel 7a features a superior AMOLED display, while Vivo Y39 comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Vivo Y39 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at 1000 nits. Notably, Google Pixel 7a offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo Y39 features a larger 6500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo Y39 also supports faster wired charging at 44W, compared to 18W on Google Pixel 7a. Google Pixel 7a supports wireless charging at 5W, while Vivo Y39 does not support wireless charging.
Google Pixel 7a offers better protection against water and dust with an IP67 rating.
- Google Pixel 7a – Check price here
- Vivo Y39 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.