Honor 200 Pro alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
vivo Y400 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Honor 200 Pro

Honor 200 Pro
-
Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
4 nm
-
5200 mAh
100W
-
6.78"
1224x2700 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720
3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom
12 MP
f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.1, (wide)
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.45, (wide), 1/3.1", 0.7µm
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Honor 200 Pro with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the vivo Y400 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Honor 200 Pro offers 4 years of OS updates, whereas vivo Y400 provides 2 years. For security updates, Honor 200 Pro offers 5 years of support compared to vivo Y400's 3 years.
Both Honor 200 Pro and vivo Y400 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Honor 200 Pro also boasts a brighter screen with 4000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Honor 200 Pro offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
vivo Y400 features a larger 6000 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Honor 200 Pro also supports faster wired charging at 100W, compared to 90W on vivo Y400. Honor 200 Pro supports wireless charging at 66W, while vivo Y400 does not support wireless charging.
vivo Y400 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
- Honor 200 Pro – Check price here
- vivo Y400 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.