Honor 200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Honor X9c alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom
12 MP
f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide)
1080p@30/60fps
1080p@30fps
f/2.1, (wide)
f/2.5, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
2 5G bands
n3, n40
2 5G bands
n3, n40
In this performance comparison, the Honor 200 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Honor X9c with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Honor 200 offers 2 years of OS updates, while Honor X9c does not have confirmed OS update information. Honor 200 receives 3 years of security updates, while Honor X9c does not have confirmed security update information.
Both Honor 200 and Honor X9c feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at 4000 nits. Notably, Honor X9c offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Honor X9c features a larger 6600 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Honor 200 also supports faster wired charging at 100W, compared to 66W on Honor X9c.
Honor X9c includes an IP65M rating, while Honor 200 lacks an official IP rating.
- Honor 200 – Check price here
- Honor X9c – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.