Honor 200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Bold alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
6GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom
12 MP
f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF
(wide), Sony, AF
2 MP
macro
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.1, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
2 5G bands
n3, n40
13 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Honor 200 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Bold with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Honor 200 offers 2 years of OS updates, whereas Lava Bold provides 1 years. For security updates, Honor 200 offers 3 years of support compared to Lava Bold's 2 years.
Both Honor 200 and Lava Bold feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Honor 200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Honor 200 comes with a larger 5200 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Honor 200 also supports faster wired charging at 100W, compared to 33W on Lava Bold.
Lava Bold includes an IP64 rating, while Honor 200 lacks an official IP rating.
- Lava Bold – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.