Honor 200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Bold N1 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Bold N1

Lava Bold N1
-
Unisoc SC9863A
28 nm
-
5000 mAh
10W
-
6.75"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom
12 MP
f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF
f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.1, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
In this performance comparison, the Honor 200 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Bold N1 with the Unisoc Unisoc SC9863A (28nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Honor 200 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Bold N1 comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Honor 200 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Honor 200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Honor 200 comes with a larger 5200 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Honor 200 also supports faster wired charging at 100W, compared to 10W on Lava Bold N1.
Lava Bold N1 includes an IP54 rating, while Honor 200 lacks an official IP rating.
- Honor 200 – Check price here
- Lava Bold N1 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.