Honor 200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Play Ultra alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Play Ultra

Lava Play Ultra
-
Dimensity 7300
4 nm
-
5000 mAh
33W
-
6.67"
1080 x 2400 pixels
-
64 MP
4K@30/60fps
-
Specs
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
8GB 128GB (UFS 3.1)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom
12 MP
f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF
(wide), 1/1.73", Sony IMX682, PDAF
5 MP
macro
1080p@30/60fps
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.1, (wide)
wide
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
2 5G bands
n3, n40
9 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n41, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Honor 200 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Play Ultra with the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both Honor 200 and Lava Play Ultra offer the same software support — 2 years of OS updates and 3 years of security updates.
Both Honor 200 and Lava Play Ultra feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Honor 200 also boasts a brighter screen with 4000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Honor 200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Honor 200 comes with a larger 5200 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Honor 200 also supports faster wired charging at 100W, compared to 33W on Lava Play Ultra.
Lava Play Ultra includes an IP64 rating, while Honor 200 lacks an official IP rating.
- Honor 200 – Check price here
- Lava Play Ultra – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.