Honor 200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom
12 MP
f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF
(wide), AF
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.1, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
In this comparison, the Honor 200 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Honor 200 has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G uses an LCD panel. They have the same 120 Hz refresh rate. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Honor 200 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Honor 200 has a larger 5200 mAh battery for longer usage. Honor 200 supports faster wired charging at 100W.
Lava Shark 4G has an IP54 rating, while Honor 200 lacks official water and dust resistance.