Honor 200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Yuva Star 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Yuva Star 4G

Lava Yuva Star 4G
-
Unisoc SC9863A
28 nm
-
5000 mAh
10W
-
6.75"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom
12 MP
f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF
(wide), AF
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.1, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
In this comparison, the Honor 200 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Yuva Star 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc SC9863A (28nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
The Honor 200 offers 2 years of OS updates, while the Lava Yuva Star 4G provides 1 years. When it comes to security updates, Honor 200 leads with 3 years of support.
Honor 200 has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Yuva Star 4G uses an LCD panel. Moreover, it offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Honor 200 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Honor 200 has a larger 5200 mAh battery for longer usage. Honor 200 supports faster wired charging at 100W.
Neither phone has an official IP rating for water and dust resistance.