Honor 200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Yuva Star 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Yuva Star 4G

Lava Yuva Star 4G
-
Unisoc SC9863A
28 nm
-
5000 mAh
10W
-
6.75"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom
12 MP
f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF
(wide), AF
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.1, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
In this performance comparison, the Honor 200 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Yuva Star 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc SC9863A (28nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Honor 200 offers 2 years of OS updates, whereas Lava Yuva Star 4G provides 1 years. For security updates, Honor 200 offers 3 years of support compared to Lava Yuva Star 4G's 2 years.
Honor 200 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Yuva Star 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Honor 200 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Honor 200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Honor 200 comes with a larger 5200 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Honor 200 also supports faster wired charging at 100W, compared to 10W on Lava Yuva Star 4G.
Neither phone has an official IP rating for water and dust resistance.
- Honor 200 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.