Honor 200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Oppo K13x alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
6GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom
12 MP
f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF
OmniVision OV50D, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP,
f/2.4, (Mono)
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.1, (wide)
GalaxyCore GC08A8, f/2.0, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
2 5G bands
n3, n40
9 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n41, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Honor 200 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Oppo K13x with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both Honor 200 and Oppo K13x offer the same software support — 2 years of OS updates and 3 years of security updates.
Honor 200 features a superior AMOLED display, while Oppo K13x comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Honor 200 also boasts a brighter screen with 4000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Honor 200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Oppo K13x features a larger 6000 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Honor 200 also supports faster wired charging at 100W, compared to 45W on Oppo K13x.
Oppo K13x includes an IP65 rating, while Honor 200 lacks an official IP rating.
- Honor 200 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.