Honor 200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Poco M7 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom
12 MP
f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.96", PDAF
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.1, (wide)
f/2.0, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
2 5G bands
n3, n40
16 5G bands
n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n26, n28, n38, n40, n41, n48, n66, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Honor 200 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Poco M7 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both phones offer the same 2 years of OS update support. For security updates, Poco M7 offers 4 years of support compared to Honor 200's 3 years.
Honor 200 features a superior AMOLED display, while Poco M7 comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Honor 200 also boasts a brighter screen with 4000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Honor 200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Honor 200 comes with a larger 5200 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Honor 200 also supports faster wired charging at 100W, compared to 18W on Poco M7.
Poco M7 includes an IP52 rating, while Honor 200 lacks an official IP rating.
- Honor 200 – Check price here
- Poco M7 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.