Honor 200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Poco X7 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom
12 MP
f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF
f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30/60fps
1080p@30/60/120fps
f/2.1, (wide)
f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 0.7µm
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N48, N77, N78
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N48, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Honor 200 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Poco X7 with the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Poco X7 offers 3 years of OS updates, whereas Honor 200 provides 2 years. For security updates, Poco X7 offers 4 years of support compared to Honor 200's 3 years.
Both Honor 200 and Poco X7 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Honor 200 also boasts a brighter screen with 4000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Poco X7 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Poco X7 features a larger 5500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Honor 200 also supports faster wired charging at 100W, compared to 45W on Poco X7.
Poco X7 includes an IP69 rating, while Honor 200 lacks an official IP rating.
- Honor 200 – Check price here
- Poco X7 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.