Honor 200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Redmi A3 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
3GB 64GB (eMMC 5.1)
4GB 64GB (eMMC 5.1)
4GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
6GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom
12 MP
f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF
f/2.0, (wide)
0.08 MP
(auxiliary lens)
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.1, (wide)
f/2.2, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
In this comparison, the Honor 200 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Redmi A3 4G with the Mediatek Helio G36 (12nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Both phones offer the same OS update support and receive security updates for the same duration.
Honor 200 has a superior AMOLED display, while Redmi A3 4G uses an LCD panel. Moreover, it offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. Honor 200 also has a brighter display with 4000 nits, improving outdoor visibility. Notably, Honor 200 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Honor 200 has a larger 5200 mAh battery for longer usage. Honor 200 supports faster wired charging at 100W.
Neither phone has an official IP rating for water and dust resistance.