Honor 200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Redmi A3 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
3GB 64GB (eMMC 5.1)
4GB 64GB (eMMC 5.1)
4GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
6GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom
12 MP
f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF
f/2.0, (wide)
0.08 MP
(auxiliary lens)
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.1, (wide)
f/2.2, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
In this performance comparison, the Honor 200 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Redmi A3 4G with the Mediatek Helio G36 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both Honor 200 and Redmi A3 4G offer the same software support — 2 years of OS updates and 3 years of security updates.
Honor 200 features a superior AMOLED display, while Redmi A3 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Honor 200 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Honor 200 also boasts a brighter screen with 4000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Honor 200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Honor 200 comes with a larger 5200 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Honor 200 also supports faster wired charging at 100W, compared to 10W on Redmi A3 4G.
Neither phone has an official IP rating for water and dust resistance.
- Honor 200 – Check price here
- Redmi A3 4G – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.