Honor 200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A34 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A34

Samsung Galaxy A34
-
Dimensity 1080
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.6"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
48 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom
12 MP
f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF
f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30/60fps
1080p@30/60fps
720p@480fps
f/2.1, (wide)
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm
1080p@30fps
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N3, N7, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N3, N7, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Honor 200 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy A34 with the Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy A34 offers 4 years of OS updates, whereas Honor 200 provides 2 years. For security updates, Samsung Galaxy A34 offers 5 years of support compared to Honor 200's 3 years.
Both Honor 200 and Samsung Galaxy A34 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Honor 200 also boasts a brighter screen with 4000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Honor 200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Honor 200 comes with a larger 5200 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Honor 200 also supports faster wired charging at 100W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy A34.
Samsung Galaxy A34 includes an IP67 rating, while Honor 200 lacks an official IP rating.
- Honor 200 – Check price here
- Samsung Galaxy A34 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.