Honor 200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Tecno Pop 9 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Tecno Pop 9 4G

Tecno Pop 9 4G
-
Helio G50
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
15W
-
6.67"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom
12 MP
f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF
f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1.12µm, PDAF
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.1, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
In this performance comparison, the Honor 200 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Tecno Pop 9 4G with the MediaTek Helio G50 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Honor 200 offers 2 years of OS updates, whereas Tecno Pop 9 4G provides 1 years. For security updates, Honor 200 offers 3 years of support compared to Tecno Pop 9 4G's 2 years.
Honor 200 features a superior AMOLED display, while Tecno Pop 9 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Honor 200 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Honor 200 also boasts a brighter screen with 4000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Honor 200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Honor 200 comes with a larger 5200 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Honor 200 also supports faster wired charging at 100W, compared to 15W on Tecno Pop 9 4G.
Tecno Pop 9 4G includes an IP54 rating, while Honor 200 lacks an official IP rating.
- Honor 200 – Check price here
- Tecno Pop 9 4G – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.