Honor 200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Tecno Pova Curve 5G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Tecno Pova Curve 5G

Tecno Pova Curve 5G
-
Dimensity 7300
4 nm
-
5500 mAh
45W
-
6.78"
1080 x 2436 pixels
-
64 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom
12 MP
f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF
Sony IMX682, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30/60fps
1080p@30fps
f/2.1, (wide)
(Wide), f/2.2
1080p@30fps
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N3
TDD: N38
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
In this performance comparison, the Honor 200 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Tecno Pova Curve 5G with the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both phones offer the same 2 years of OS update support. For security updates, Honor 200 offers 3 years of support compared to Tecno Pova Curve 5G's 2 years.
Both Honor 200 and Tecno Pova Curve 5G feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. In terms of smoothness, Tecno Pova Curve 5G offers a higher 144 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Honor 200 also boasts a brighter screen with 4000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Honor 200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Tecno Pova Curve 5G features a larger 5500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Honor 200 also supports faster wired charging at 100W, compared to 45W on Tecno Pova Curve 5G.
Tecno Pova Curve 5G includes an IP64 rating, while Honor 200 lacks an official IP rating.
- Honor 200 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.