Honor 200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo T4x alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
8GB 128GB (UFS 3.1)
8GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom
12 MP
f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30/60fps
1080p@30fps
f/2.1, (wide)
f/2.1, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
2 5G bands
n3, n40
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Honor 200 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Vivo T4x with the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both Honor 200 and Vivo T4x offer the same software support — 2 years of OS updates and 3 years of security updates.
Honor 200 features a superior AMOLED display, while Vivo T4x comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Honor 200 also boasts a brighter screen with 4000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Honor 200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo T4x features a larger 6500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Honor 200 also supports faster wired charging at 100W, compared to 44W on Vivo T4x.
Vivo T4x includes an IP64 rating, while Honor 200 lacks an official IP rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.