Honor 200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y29 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
6GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
8GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
8GB 256GB (eMMC 5.1)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom
12 MP
f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
0.08 MP
f/3.0
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.1, (wide)
f/2.0, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
2 5G bands
n3, n40
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Honor 200 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Vivo Y29 with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Honor 200 offers 2 years of OS updates, whereas Vivo Y29 provides 1 years. Both phones receive the same 3 years of security updates.
Honor 200 features a superior AMOLED display, while Vivo Y29 comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Honor 200 also boasts a brighter screen with 4000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Honor 200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo Y29 features a larger 5500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Honor 200 also supports faster wired charging at 100W, compared to 44W on Vivo Y29.
Vivo Y29 includes an IP64 rating, while Honor 200 lacks an official IP rating.
- Honor 200 – Check price here
- Vivo Y29 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.