Honor 200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom
12 MP
f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.1, (wide)
f/2.5, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Honor 200 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Vivo Y300 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both Honor 200 and Vivo Y300 offer the same software support — 2 years of OS updates and 3 years of security updates.
Both Honor 200 and Vivo Y300 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Honor 200 also boasts a brighter screen with 4000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Honor 200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Honor 200 comes with a larger 5200 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Honor 200 also supports faster wired charging at 100W, compared to 80W on Vivo Y300.
Vivo Y300 includes an IP64 rating, while Honor 200 lacks an official IP rating.
- Honor 200 – Check price here
- Vivo Y300 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.