Honor 200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 Plus alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 Plus

Vivo Y300 Plus
-
Snapdragon 695
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
44W
-
6.78"
1080 x 2400 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold
6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom
12 MP
f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.1, (wide)
f/2.5, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8
TDD: N77, N78
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Honor 200 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Vivo Y300 Plus with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both Honor 200 and Vivo Y300 Plus offer the same software support — 2 years of OS updates and 3 years of security updates.
Both Honor 200 and Vivo Y300 Plus feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Honor 200 also boasts a brighter screen with 4000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Honor 200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Honor 200 comes with a larger 5200 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Honor 200 also supports faster wired charging at 100W, compared to 44W on Vivo Y300 Plus.
Vivo Y300 Plus includes an IP54 rating, while Honor 200 lacks an official IP rating.
- Honor 200 – Check price here
- Vivo Y300 Plus – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.