Honor 200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
vivo Y400 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
8GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom
12 MP
f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.1, (wide)
f/2.45, (wide), 1/3.1", 0.7µm
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
2 5G bands
n3, n40
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Honor 200 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the vivo Y400 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both Honor 200 and vivo Y400 offer the same software support — 2 years of OS updates and 3 years of security updates.
Both Honor 200 and vivo Y400 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Honor 200 also boasts a brighter screen with 4000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Honor 200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
vivo Y400 features a larger 6000 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Honor 200 also supports faster wired charging at 100W, compared to 90W on vivo Y400.
vivo Y400 includes an IP69 rating, while Honor 200 lacks an official IP rating.
- vivo Y400 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.