Honor X7c alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 5G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 5G
Lava Shark 5G
-
Unisoc T765
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.75"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76
2.1 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
(wide), AF
f/2.2, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
7 5G bands
n1, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Honor X7c with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 5G with the Unisoc Unisoc T765 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both Honor X7c and Lava Shark 5G use LCD screens. In terms of smoothness, Honor X7c offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Honor X7c offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Honor X7c comes with a larger 5200 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Honor X7c also supports faster wired charging at 35W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 5G.
Honor X7c offers better protection against water and dust with an IP64 rating.
- Honor X7c – Check price here
- Lava Shark 5G – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.