Honor X7c alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A17 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A17
Samsung Galaxy A17
-
Exynos 1330
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
-
Specs
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF, OIS
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro), 1/5.0", 1.75µm
f/2.2, (wide)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm
13 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n6, n7, n8, n26, n28, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Honor X7c with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy A17 with the Exynos 1330 (5nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy A17 launched with Android 15 and will receive updates, while Honor X7c has no confirmed OS update information. Samsung Galaxy A17 receives 6 years of security updates, while Honor X7c does not have confirmed info.
Samsung Galaxy A17 features a superior AMOLED display, while Honor X7c comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Honor X7c offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Honor X7c also boasts a brighter screen with 850 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Honor X7c comes with a larger 5200 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Honor X7c also supports faster wired charging at 35W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy A17.
Honor X7c offers better protection against water and dust with an IP64 rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.