Honor X7c alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F15 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F15
Samsung Galaxy F15
-
Dimensity 6100+
6 nm
-
6000 mAh
25W
-
6.6"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 128GB
8GB 128GB
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/1.8, (wide), AF
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/2.2, (wide)
f/2.0, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
13 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Honor X7c with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy F15 with the Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy F15 offers 4 years of OS updates, while Honor X7c does not have confirmed OS update information. Samsung Galaxy F15 receives 5 years of security updates, while Honor X7c does not have confirmed security update information.
Samsung Galaxy F15 features a superior AMOLED display, while Honor X7c comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Honor X7c offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Honor X7c also boasts a brighter screen with 850 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Samsung Galaxy F15 features a larger 6000 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Honor X7c also supports faster wired charging at 35W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy F15.
Honor X7c includes an IP64 rating, while Samsung Galaxy F15 lacks an official IP rating.
- Honor X7c – Check price here
- Samsung Galaxy F15 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.