Honor X7c alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
16GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p
f/2.2, (wide)
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo X200 with its Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Honor X7c with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo X200 offers 4 years of OS updates, while Honor X7c does not have confirmed OS update information. Vivo X200 receives 5 years of security updates, while Honor X7c does not have confirmed security update information.
Vivo X200 features a superior AMOLED display, while Honor X7c comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo X200 also boasts a brighter screen with 4500 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo X200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo X200 features a larger 5800 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo X200 also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 35W on Honor X7c.
Vivo X200 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
- Honor X7c – Check price here
- Vivo X200 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.