Honor X9c alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 5G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 5G
Lava Shark 5G
-
Unisoc T765
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.75"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76
2.1 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide)
(wide), AF
1080p@30fps
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
2 5G bands
n3, n40
7 5G bands
n1, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Honor X9c with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 5G with the Unisoc Unisoc T765 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Honor X9c features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 5G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Honor X9c offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Honor X9c offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Honor X9c comes with a larger 6600 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Honor X9c also supports faster wired charging at 66W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 5G.
Honor X9c offers better protection against water and dust with an IP65M rating.
- Honor X9c – Check price here
- Lava Shark 5G – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.