Honor X9c alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Poco F6 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720
3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520
12GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide)
(f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS)
8 MP
((ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm)
1080p@30fps
1080p@30/60/120/240fps
f/2.5, (wide)
f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
2 5G bands
n3, n40
14 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n48, n66, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Poco F6 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Honor X9c with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Poco F6 launched with Android 14 and will receive updates, while Honor X9c has no confirmed OS update information. Poco F6 receives 4 years of security updates, while Honor X9c does not have confirmed info.
Both Honor X9c and Poco F6 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Honor X9c also boasts a brighter screen with 4000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Honor X9c offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Honor X9c comes with a larger 6600 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Poco F6 also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 66W on Honor X9c.
Honor X9c offers better protection against water and dust with an IP65M rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.