Honor X9c alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F14 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F14

Samsung Galaxy F14
-
Exynos 1330
5 nm
-
6000 mAh
25W
-
6.6"
1080x2408 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30fps
f/2.5, (wide)
f/2.0, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
2 5G bands
n3, n40
13 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Honor X9c with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy F14 with the Exynos 1330 (5nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy F14 launched with Android 13 and will receive updates, while Honor X9c has no confirmed OS update information. Samsung Galaxy F14 receives 4 years of security updates, while Honor X9c does not have confirmed info.
Honor X9c features a superior AMOLED display, while Samsung Galaxy F14 comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Honor X9c offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Honor X9c offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Honor X9c comes with a larger 6600 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Honor X9c also supports faster wired charging at 66W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy F14.
Honor X9c includes an IP65M rating, while Samsung Galaxy F14 lacks an official IP rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.