Honor X9c alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F16 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F16

Samsung Galaxy F16
-
Dimensity 6300
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 128GB
8GB 128GB
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30fps
f/2.5, (wide)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N28, N66
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N28, N66
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
In this comparison, the Honor X9c with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy F16 with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Both phones feature AMOLED displays. Moreover, it offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. Honor X9c also has a brighter display with 4000 nits, improving outdoor visibility. Notably, Honor X9c has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Honor X9c has a larger 6600 mAh battery for longer usage. Honor X9c supports faster wired charging at 66W.
Honor X9c offers better water and dust resistance with an IP65M rating.
- Honor X9c – Check price here