Honor X9c alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F36 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F36

Samsung Galaxy F36
-
Exynos 1380
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 128GB
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.96", PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30fps
1080p@30/60fps
720p@480fps, gyro-EIS
f/2.5, (wide)
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N78
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy F36 with its Exynos 1380 (5nm) performs better than the Honor X9c with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both Honor X9c and Samsung Galaxy F36 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Honor X9c offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Honor X9c comes with a larger 6600 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Honor X9c also supports faster wired charging at 66W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy F36.
Honor X9c includes an IP65M rating, while Samsung Galaxy F36 lacks an official IP rating.
- Honor X9c – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.