Honor X9c alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F54 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F54
Samsung Galaxy F54
-
Exynos 1380
5 nm
-
6000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2400 pixels
-
108 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30fps
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.5, (wide)
f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
2 5G bands
n3, n40
10 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n28, n40, n41, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy F54 with its Exynos 1380 (5nm) performs better than the Honor X9c with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy F54 offers 4 years of OS updates, while Honor X9c does not have confirmed OS update information. Samsung Galaxy F54 receives 5 years of security updates, while Honor X9c does not have confirmed security update information.
Both Honor X9c and Samsung Galaxy F54 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Honor X9c also boasts a brighter screen with 4000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Honor X9c offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Honor X9c comes with a larger 6600 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Honor X9c also supports faster wired charging at 66W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy F54.
Honor X9c includes an IP65M rating, while Samsung Galaxy F54 lacks an official IP rating.
- Honor X9c – Check price here
- Samsung Galaxy F54 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.