Honor X9c alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy M35 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy M35

Samsung Galaxy M35
-
Exynos 1380
5 nm
-
6000 mAh
25W
-
6.6"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.96", PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30fps
1080p@30/60fps
720p@480fps
f/2.5, (wide)
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28, N66
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28, N66
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
In this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy M35 with the Exynos 1380 (5nm) performs better than the Honor X9c with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Both phones feature AMOLED displays. They have the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Honor X9c also has a brighter display with 4000 nits, improving outdoor visibility. Notably, Honor X9c has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Honor X9c has a larger 6600 mAh battery for longer usage. Honor X9c supports faster wired charging at 66W.
Honor X9c has an IP65M rating, while Samsung Galaxy M35 lacks official water and dust resistance.
- Honor X9c – Check price here
- Samsung Galaxy M35 – Check price here