Honor X9c alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30fps
f/2.5, (wide)
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
2 5G bands
n3, n40
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41
In this performance comparison, the Honor X9c with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm) performs better than the Vivo Y300 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo Y300 launched with Android 14 and will receive updates, while Honor X9c has no confirmed OS update information. Vivo Y300 receives 3 years of security updates, while Honor X9c does not have confirmed info.
Both Honor X9c and Vivo Y300 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Honor X9c also boasts a brighter screen with 4000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Honor X9c offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Honor X9c comes with a larger 6600 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Vivo Y300 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 66W on Honor X9c.
Honor X9c offers better protection against water and dust with an IP65M rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.