Honor X9c alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
vivo Y400 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30fps
f/2.5, (wide)
f/2.45, (wide), 1/3.1", 0.7µm
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Honor X9c with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm) performs better than the vivo Y400 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both Honor X9c and vivo Y400 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Honor X9c also boasts a brighter screen with 4000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Honor X9c offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Honor X9c comes with a larger 6600 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. vivo Y400 also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 66W on Honor X9c.
vivo Y400 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
- Honor X9c – Check price here
- vivo Y400 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.