Infinix GT 30 Pro alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Bold N1 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Infinix GT 30 Pro

Infinix GT 30 Pro
-
Dimensity 8350
4 nm
-
5500 mAh
45W
-
6.78"
1224 x 2720 pixels
-
108 MP
4K@30/60fps
- Specs
Lava Bold N1

Lava Bold N1
-
Unisoc SC9863A
28 nm
-
5000 mAh
10W
-
6.75"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715
3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55
12GB 256GB (UFS 4.0)
f/1.9, (wide), PDAF
8 MP
f/2.2, 111˚ (ultrawide), AF
f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
1080p@30/60/120/240fps
f/2.2, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N12, N20, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N12, N20, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N71, N77, N78
In this comparison, the Infinix GT 30 Pro with the Mediatek Dimensity 8350 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Bold N1 with the Unisoc Unisoc SC9863A (28nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Infinix GT 30 Pro has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Bold N1 uses an LCD panel. Moreover, it offers a higher 144 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Infinix GT 30 Pro has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Infinix GT 30 Pro has a larger 5500 mAh battery for longer usage. Infinix GT 30 Pro supports faster wired charging at 45W. Infinix GT 30 Pro supports wireless charging at 30W, while Lava Bold N1 lacks this feature.
Infinix GT 30 Pro offers better water and dust resistance with an IP64 rating.