Infinix GT 30 Pro alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Tecno Spark 30C alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Infinix GT 30 Pro
Infinix GT 30 Pro
-
Dimensity 8350
4 nm
-
5500 mAh
45W
-
6.78"
1224 x 2720 pixels
-
108 MP
4K@30/60fps
- Specs
Tecno Spark 30C
Tecno Spark 30C
-
Dimensity 6300
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
48 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715
3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
12GB 256GB (UFS 4.0)
4GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
f/1.9, (wide), PDAF
8 MP
f/2.2, 111˚ (ultrawide), AF
(wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF
1080p@30/60/120/240fps
f/2.2, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N12, N20, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N12, N20, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N71, N77, N78
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
In this performance comparison, the Infinix GT 30 Pro with its Mediatek Dimensity 8350 (4nm) performs better than the Tecno Spark 30C with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Infinix GT 30 Pro features a superior AMOLED display, while Tecno Spark 30C comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Infinix GT 30 Pro offers a higher 144 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Infinix GT 30 Pro offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Infinix GT 30 Pro comes with a larger 5500 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Infinix GT 30 Pro also supports faster wired charging at 45W, compared to 18W on Tecno Spark 30C. Infinix GT 30 Pro supports wireless charging at 30W, while Tecno Spark 30C does not support wireless charging.
Infinix GT 30 Pro offers better protection against water and dust with an IP64 rating.
- Tecno Spark 30C – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.