Infinix GT 30 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Realme Narzo 80x alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Infinix GT 30

Infinix GT 30
-
Dimensity 7400
4 nm
-
5500 mAh
45W
-
6.78"
1224 x 2720 pixels
-
64 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
Realme Narzo 80x

Realme Narzo 80x
-
Dimensity 6400
6 nm
-
6000 mAh
45W
-
6.72"
1080 x 2400 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30/60fps
-
Specs
4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2.5 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76
2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.75, 23mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8μm, PDAF
8 MP
f/2.2, 111˚, (ultrawide), AF
f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30/120fps
f/2.2, 25mm (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
11 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n6, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41, n77, n78
9 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n41, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Infinix GT 30 with its MediaTek Dimensity 7400 (4nm) performs better than the Realme Narzo 80x with the Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Infinix GT 30 offers 2 years of OS updates, while Realme Narzo 80x does not have confirmed OS update information. Infinix GT 30 receives 3 years of security updates, while Realme Narzo 80x does not have confirmed security update information.
Infinix GT 30 features a superior AMOLED display, while Realme Narzo 80x comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Infinix GT 30 offers a higher 144 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Infinix GT 30 also boasts a brighter screen with 1600 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Infinix GT 30 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Realme Narzo 80x features a larger 6000 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Both devices support the same wired charging speed of 45W.
Realme Narzo 80x offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
- Realme Narzo 80x – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.