iQOO 12 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Tecno Pova Slim alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Tecno Pova Slim
Tecno Pova Slim
-
Dimensity 6400
6 nm
-
5160 mAh
45W
-
6.78"
1224 x 2720 pixels
-
50 MP
1440p@30fps
-
Specs
1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720
2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720
2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520
2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
12GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
16GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
16GB 1024GB (UFS 4.0)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
64 MP,
f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), AF
f/1.79, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
4K@24/30/60fps
1080p@30/60/120/240fps
1080p@30fps
f/2.5, (wide)
f/2.0, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
11 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the iQOO 12 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Tecno Pova Slim with the Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
iQOO 12 offers 3 years of OS updates, whereas Tecno Pova Slim provides 1 years. For security updates, iQOO 12 offers 4 years of support compared to Tecno Pova Slim's 2 years.
Both iQOO 12 and Tecno Pova Slim feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 144 Hz refresh rate. Tecno Pova Slim also boasts a brighter screen with 4500 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, iQOO 12 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Tecno Pova Slim features a larger 5160 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. iQOO 12 also supports faster wired charging at 120W, compared to 45W on Tecno Pova Slim.
Both phones feature the same IP64 rating for water and dust resistance.
- iQOO 12 – Check price here
- Tecno Pova Slim – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.