Lava Agni 3 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Oppo A3 Pro alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Agni 3

Lava Agni 3
-
Dimensity 7300
4 nm
-
5000 mAh
66W
-
6.78"
1200 x 2652 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
Oppo A3 Pro

Oppo A3 Pro
-
Dimensity 6300
6 nm
-
5100 mAh
45W
-
6.67"
720x1604 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30/60fps
-
Specs
4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
(telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, 3x optical zoom
8 MP
112˚ (ultrawide)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30fps
f/2.0, (wide), 1.0µm
f/2.0, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Lava Agni 3 with its Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) performs better than the Oppo A3 Pro with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Lava Agni 3 offers 3 years of OS updates, whereas Oppo A3 Pro provides 2 years. For security updates, Lava Agni 3 offers 4 years of support compared to Oppo A3 Pro's 3 years.
Lava Agni 3 features a superior AMOLED display, while Oppo A3 Pro comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Lava Agni 3 also boasts a brighter screen with 1200 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Lava Agni 3 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Oppo A3 Pro features a larger 5100 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Lava Agni 3 also supports faster wired charging at 66W, compared to 45W on Oppo A3 Pro.
Lava Agni 3 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP64 rating.
- Lava Agni 3 – Check price here
- Oppo A3 Pro – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.