Lava Blaze 3 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
vivo T4R alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Blaze 3

Lava Blaze 3
-
Dimensity 6300
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.56"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
50 MP
1440p@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
2 MP
f/1.79, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, Sony IMX882, PDAF, OIS
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30fps
1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS
(wide)
f/2.45, (wide), 1/3.1", 0.7µm
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the vivo T4R with its MediaTek Dimensity 7400 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Blaze 3 with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both Lava Blaze 3 and vivo T4R offer the same software support — 2 years of OS updates and 3 years of security updates.
vivo T4R features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Blaze 3 comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, vivo T4R offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. vivo T4R also boasts a brighter screen with 1800 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, vivo T4R offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
vivo T4R features a larger 5700 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. vivo T4R also supports faster wired charging at 44W, compared to 18W on Lava Blaze 3.
vivo T4R includes an IP69 rating, while Lava Blaze 3 lacks an official IP rating.
- Lava Blaze 3 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.