Lava Blaze 3 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Blaze 3
Lava Blaze 3
-
Dimensity 6300
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.56"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
50 MP
1440p@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
16GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
(wide), AF
2 MP
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
1080p
(wide)
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this comparison, the Vivo X200 with the Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Lava Blaze 3 with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
The Vivo X200 offers 4 years of OS updates, while the Lava Blaze 3 provides 2 years. When it comes to security updates, Vivo X200 leads with 5 years of support.
Vivo X200 has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Blaze 3 uses an LCD panel. Moreover, Vivo X200 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. Vivo X200 also has a brighter display with 4500 nits, improving outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo X200 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Vivo X200 has a larger 5800 mAh battery for longer usage. Vivo X200 supports faster wired charging at 90W.
Vivo X200 has an IP69 rating, while Lava Blaze 3 lacks official water and dust resistance.