Lava Blaze 3 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Blaze 3
Lava Blaze 3
-
Dimensity 6300
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.56"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
50 MP
1440p@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
2 MP
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30fps
(wide)
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this comparison, the Vivo Y300 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Blaze 3 with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Both phones offer the same OS update support and receive security updates for the same duration.
Vivo Y300 has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Blaze 3 uses an LCD panel. Moreover, Vivo Y300 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. Vivo Y300 also has a brighter display with 1800 nits, improving outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo Y300 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Both phones have the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Vivo Y300 supports faster wired charging at 80W.
Vivo Y300 has an IP64 rating, while Lava Blaze 3 lacks official water and dust resistance.