Lava Blaze 3 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 Plus alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Blaze 3
Lava Blaze 3
-
Dimensity 6300
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.56"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
50 MP
1440p@30fps
-
Specs
Vivo Y300 Plus
Vivo Y300 Plus
-
Snapdragon 695
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
44W
-
6.78"
1080 x 2400 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold
6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver
(wide), AF
2 MP
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30fps
(wide)
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8
TDD: N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo Y300 Plus with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) performs better than the Lava Blaze 3 with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both Lava Blaze 3 and Vivo Y300 Plus offer the same software support — 2 years of OS updates and 3 years of security updates.
Vivo Y300 Plus features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Blaze 3 comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Vivo Y300 Plus offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Vivo Y300 Plus also boasts a brighter screen with 1300 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo Y300 Plus offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Vivo Y300 Plus also supports faster wired charging at 44W, compared to 18W on Lava Blaze 3.
Vivo Y300 Plus includes an IP54 rating, while Lava Blaze 3 lacks an official IP rating.
- Lava Blaze 3 – Check price here
- Vivo Y300 Plus – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.