Lava Blaze Amoled 2 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Oppo Reno12 Pro alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Blaze Amoled 2

Lava Blaze Amoled 2
-
Dimensity 7060
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
33W
-
6.67"
1080 x 2400 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
Oppo Reno12 Pro

Oppo Reno12 Pro
-
Dimensity 7300 Energy
4 nm
-
5000 mAh
80W
-
6.7"
1080x2412 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
(wide), AF
Auxiliary lens
f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.75", PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP
f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
1080p@30/60/120/480fps
720p@960fps
f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.75", PDAF
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
9 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n41, n77, n78
16 5G bands
n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n12, n20, n26, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Oppo Reno12 Pro with its Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4nm) performs better than the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 with the Mediatek Dimensity 7060 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Oppo Reno12 Pro offers 3 years of OS updates, whereas Lava Blaze Amoled 2 provides 1 years. For security updates, Oppo Reno12 Pro offers 4 years of support compared to Lava Blaze Amoled 2's 2 years.
Both Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Oppo Reno12 Pro feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Oppo Reno12 Pro also boasts a brighter screen with 1200 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Oppo Reno12 Pro also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 33W on Lava Blaze Amoled 2.
Oppo Reno12 Pro offers better protection against water and dust with an IP65 rating.
- Lava Blaze Amoled 2 – Check price here
- Oppo Reno12 Pro – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.