Lava Blaze Dragon alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Motorola Moto G85 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Blaze Dragon

Lava Blaze Dragon
-
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
4 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.75"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@60fps
- Specs
Motorola Moto G85

Motorola Moto G85
-
Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
33W
-
6.67"
1080x2400 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30/60fps
-
Specs
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold
6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide)
f/1.8 (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF
f/2.4, (wide), 0.7µm
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Motorola Moto G85 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6nm) performs better than the Lava Blaze Dragon with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Motorola Moto G85 offers 2 years of OS updates, whereas Lava Blaze Dragon provides 1 years. For security updates, Motorola Moto G85 offers 3 years of support compared to Lava Blaze Dragon's 2 years.
Motorola Moto G85 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Blaze Dragon comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Motorola Moto G85 also boasts a brighter screen with 1600 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Motorola Moto G85 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Motorola Moto G85 also supports faster wired charging at 33W, compared to 18W on Lava Blaze Dragon.
Motorola Moto G85 includes an IP52 rating, while Lava Blaze Dragon lacks an official IP rating.
- Motorola Moto G85 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.