Lava Blaze Dragon alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A25 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Blaze Dragon

Lava Blaze Dragon
-
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
4 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.75"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@60fps
- Specs
Samsung Galaxy A25

Samsung Galaxy A25
-
Exynos 1280
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.5"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide)
f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30fps
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N26, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N26, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N66, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Lava Blaze Dragon with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 with the Exynos 1280 (5nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy A25 offers 4 years of OS updates, whereas Lava Blaze Dragon provides 1 years. For security updates, Samsung Galaxy A25 offers 5 years of support compared to Lava Blaze Dragon's 2 years.
Samsung Galaxy A25 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Blaze Dragon comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Samsung Galaxy A25 also boasts a brighter screen with 500 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Samsung Galaxy A25 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A25 also supports faster wired charging at 25W, compared to 18W on Lava Blaze Dragon.
Neither phone has an official IP rating for water and dust resistance.
- Samsung Galaxy A25 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.