Lava Blaze Dragon alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo T3 Ultra alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Blaze Dragon

Lava Blaze Dragon
-
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
4 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.75"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@60fps
- Specs
Vivo T3 Ultra

Vivo T3 Ultra
-
Dimensity 9200+
4 nm
-
5500 mAh
80W
-
6.78"
1260 x 2800 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30/60fps
-
Specs
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3
3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510
8GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
12GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
(wide)
f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
1080p@30fps
f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo T3 Ultra with its Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4nm) performs better than the Lava Blaze Dragon with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo T3 Ultra offers 2 years of OS updates, whereas Lava Blaze Dragon provides 1 years. For security updates, Vivo T3 Ultra offers 3 years of support compared to Lava Blaze Dragon's 2 years.
Vivo T3 Ultra features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Blaze Dragon comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo T3 Ultra also boasts a brighter screen with 4500 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo T3 Ultra offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo T3 Ultra features a larger 5500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo T3 Ultra also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 18W on Lava Blaze Dragon.
Vivo T3 Ultra includes an IP68 rating, while Lava Blaze Dragon lacks an official IP rating.
- Vivo T3 Ultra – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.