Lava Blaze Dragon alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
vivo T4R alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Blaze Dragon

Lava Blaze Dragon
-
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
4 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.75"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@60fps
- Specs
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide)
f/1.79, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, Sony IMX882, PDAF, OIS
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS
f/2.45, (wide), 1/3.1", 0.7µm
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the vivo T4R with its MediaTek Dimensity 7400 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Blaze Dragon with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
vivo T4R offers 2 years of OS updates, whereas Lava Blaze Dragon provides 1 years. For security updates, vivo T4R offers 3 years of support compared to Lava Blaze Dragon's 2 years.
vivo T4R features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Blaze Dragon comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. vivo T4R also boasts a brighter screen with 1800 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, vivo T4R offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
vivo T4R features a larger 5700 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. vivo T4R also supports faster wired charging at 44W, compared to 18W on Lava Blaze Dragon.
vivo T4R includes an IP69 rating, while Lava Blaze Dragon lacks an official IP rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.